Nowadays, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/B-2 Spirit original.jpg is a topic that is constantly talked about and that continues to generate great interest in society. For years, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/B-2 Spirit original.jpg has proven to be a determining factor in various aspects of our daily lives, from politics to technology, including culture and the economy. Its influence is so marked that it leaves no one indifferent, since Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/B-2 Spirit original.jpg has managed to capture the attention of specialists, experts and the general public. In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/B-2 Spirit original.jpg to understand its importance, its implications and the impact it has had and will continue to have on our lives.
Weak support. I wish it was bigger, but I do think it is an aesthetically pleasing image of an encyclopedic subject. JHMM1303:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Strong Support Larger - I prefer the one with more sky, but either one is nice. Very enc., and beatiful composition. --TotoBaggins04:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
When I was little, there was a picture of one of these on my "play room" wall and for the longest time I thought it was, in fact, an actual picture of a spaceship because the image was shot from the direct side angle so I couldn't see the V-shaped wings. Amazing how imaginations run wild at that age. JHMM1307:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I disagree, trialsanderrors. I think the angle is perfectly encyclopedic as it displays the famous V-shape of the aircraft. JHMM1307:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think any of those pictures are a good picture of the B-2. One or two might be good pictures of the B-2 in the midst of a mid-air refueling, but none as striking as it alone in the sky from above. JHMM1309:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Just a comment: for me this pic demonstrates the most enc thing about this machine: it looks like something from outer space. :) --TotoBaggins02:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
<snark> Well, shouldn't that be a reason to oppose the image - the plane not being from outer space and all? </snark> Debivort02:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Oppose, nothing special compared to some of the other plane images we have. I think the image above is nicer and gives the plane (and its size) some context. grenグレン08:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Support original - I've always liked the B-2, and yes, I see what you mean about the spaceship. I think the original looks far better because the bomber seems more 'atmospheric'. Mrug221:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
03:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
