Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg
The topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg is something that has generated great interest in today's society. For years, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg has been the subject of debates, investigations and controversies. It is a theme that addresses fundamental aspects of everyday life, as well as deeper questions about human nature. Over time, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg has evolved and adapted to changes in society, becoming a key element in the way we perceive and understand the world around us. In this article, we will explore different aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg, analyzing its influence in different areas and its relevance today. Read on to discover more about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg!
 |
 |
Two great images (sorry Solipsist :-) ), of a Blue Dragonfly.
- Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 07:55, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support #1 Image:Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg -- Chris 73 Talk 11:35, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
- I'd support #1 Image:Aust blue dragonfly02.jpg if it appeared in an article. —Korath (Talk) 15:09, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Support when placed in a proper article. -- BRIAN0918 17:50, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support if it meets the criterion of illustrating an article. Denni☯ 02:10, 2005 Mar 4 (UTC)
- Support I support the first one, the second one isn't quite as good. But I'm generally quite impressed. G-Man 22:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support The first one is an awesome shot - agree with G-man. -Lommer | talk 01:20, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support only the first one. The second shot could use some enhancing. JoJan 17:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support #1 - Bevo 16:41, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Support either. Nice pictures. But is there a higher resolution version? --jacobolus (t) 23:45, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Promoted: +10 / - 0 -- Solipsist 20:23, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)