In this article we will explore the shocking story of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg, a topic that has captured the attention of people around the world. Over time, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg has played a crucial role in the lives of numerous people, influencing not only their actions, but also their thoughts and emotions. Through a detailed and exhaustive analysis, we hope to shed light on the different aspects of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg, from its origin to its current implications. This article seeks to provide the reader with a holistic view of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Angels Flight.jpg, with the goal of fostering a deeper and richer understanding of this fascinating topic.
Nominate and support. --SPUI (talk) 10:39, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
The light in the foreground was a bit too dark. I've brightened it up somewhat and also sharpened a little bit the image. JoJan 14:04, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
New version is much worse. It's been shrunk, and lightening loses detail in the highlights. --jacobolus(t) 02:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Nothing here to make me go "wow". Denni☯ 01:11, 2005 Apr 1 (UTC)
Oppose. It's a cool thing, but the composition of this photo isn't spectacular. --jacobolus(t) 02:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Needs perspective correction, and too busy. The sign in the lower right and the staircase landing and foliage on the lower left are especially distracting. —Korath (Talk) 01:26, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with above. Enochlau 03:59, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not promoted +1/-4BrokenSegue 14:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)