In today's world, MediaWiki talk:Gadget-contribsrange.js is a topic that has gained great relevance and has generated a significant impact on society. With the passage of time, MediaWiki talk:Gadget-contribsrange.js has gained greater importance in various areas, generating discussions, debates and analysis around its relevance and implications. This is why it is essential to delve into the study and understanding of MediaWiki talk:Gadget-contribsrange.js, since its understanding and analysis are transcendental to understanding the world in which we live. In this article, we will delve into the different dimensions and aspects related to MediaWiki talk:Gadget-contribsrange.js, with the aim of providing a comprehensive perspective on this topic and its implications in today's society.
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.
Grammar error
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Hi there - not sure who's responsible for the English interface translation on the page at issue here: the Contributions list, e.g. for my username, contains a grammatical error:
Javascript-enhanced contributions lookup 0.2 enabled. You may enter a CIDR range or append an asterisk to do a prefix search. For IPv6, you must use capital letters for gadget matching, native contribution matching is not case-sensitive.
The final comma is a "splice", and should be a semicolon:
Javascript-enhanced contributions lookup 0.2 enabled. You may enter a CIDR range or append an asterisk to do a prefix search. For IPv6, you must use capital letters for gadget matching; native contribution matching is not case-sensitive.Elizium23 (talk) 00:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
If you put in space*, you get what you did, but if you append an * without the space, which is what the instruction says, it gets hung up because apparently it doesn't stop looking for your contributions once it hits 500. Also, it doesn't work nearly as well as the way I've been doing it up until now. See here (sorry for some of the offensive usernames).--Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Agree, it is a bit of a mess there, also the results are from OLDEST on so not super useful. I'm guessing that the user and non-user page elements changed (merged). — xaosfluxTalk15:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)