File talk:WMD.png

In this article, we will thoroughly explore the topic of File talk:WMD.png and its impact on today's society. Whether it is a relevant character, a historical event, a current topic or any other aspect of interest, we will delve into its origins, evolution and consequences. We will analyze its influence in various areas, from culture to politics, including economics and technology. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we will seek to provide a comprehensive and enriching vision of File talk:WMD.png, with the aim of understanding its importance and impact in the contemporary world.

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will be then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

Symbol inaccurate

The chemical warfare symbol is a dark background with nondark twin grenades (picture a comma tilted about 80, 70 degrees to the left, with an exaggerated tail) crossed, my interpretation of which is artillery shells trailing gas, which is incorrect (unless airburst) but memorable. The molecule(?) depiction is inaccurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.180.217.134 (talkcontribs) . 03:55, 17 August 2005

This symbol is quite new. See http://www.cs.amedd.army.mil/simcenter/chemical_symbol_story.htm for additional information.
Old and new versions could be added to the chemical hazard page.
Talamus 16:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

labels

Would it be possible to label the different symbols so that one could know which was which? --Jontsang 19:58, 23 May 2006 (UTC)