In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of
File talk:The Adventures of Tintin - Secret of the Unicorn.jpg, exploring its origins, impact and relevance in today's society. From its first manifestations to its influence in different areas,
File talk:The Adventures of Tintin - Secret of the Unicorn.jpg has left an indelible mark on history, awakening interest and generating passionate debates. Through a detailed and exhaustive analysis, we will take a look at the many facets of
File talk:The Adventures of Tintin - Secret of the Unicorn.jpg, examining its evolution over time and its role in shaping the contemporary world. Join us on this journey of discovery and understanding, as we unravel the mysteries and wonders of
File talk:The Adventures of Tintin - Secret of the Unicorn.jpg.
Prhartcom, because the film is primarily a UK production, I think a UK poster (with the Unicorn tagline) should do. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:24, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Kailash29792, that argument sounds quite valid, but I restored the original image for two reasons: the new image was far too large (see WP:IMAGERES) and had already been tagged as such, and worse, the dimensions were different and didn't fit well into the Infobox. If you'd like, you can try again with a UK poster that is the usual portrait-shape. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- The image may have looked out of shape and dimensions, but if you refreshed the page it would have looked better and adjusted. But I'll try again. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry for annoying you, it's true I hadn't refreshed my page. How did the landscape poster look within the portrait Infobox? Prhartcom (talk) 09:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- It was annoying indeed. But, mimicking a quote by Fairy Godmother from Shrek 2, "Happiness is just a Refresh/F5 away". Kailash29792 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- This image looks very good indeed, and the dimensions also look good. Side note: Thank-you for your support on the Talk page; be ready to help comment if needed. Prhartcom (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Not only is this film not primarily a UK production, it isn't even partially a UK production. No UK production company was involved in this film.--JOJ Hutton 21:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)