File talk:ICC-cricket-member-nations.png

Today, File talk:ICC-cricket-member-nations.png is a topic of great relevance and interest to a large number of people. Since its emergence, File talk:ICC-cricket-member-nations.png has captured the attention of experts on the subject, as well as those seeking to better understand its impact on today's society. In order to thoroughly analyze File talk:ICC-cricket-member-nations.png, it is crucial to examine its various dimensions and understand how it has evolved over time. In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of File talk:ICC-cricket-member-nations.png, exploring its origins, its current relevance and the possible future implications it could have in different areas.

Mistake, france is not hightlighted.

Neither is Norway! *frustrated Viking mode* Sam Vimes 17:55, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
Fixed! Mali, Myanmar and Slovenia have also been added. Loganberry (Talk) 16:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

and guyana is for some odd reason.

That is understandable - it's part of the West Indies (Shivnarine Chanderpaul is from there) Sam Vimes 18:55, 14 August 2005 (UTC)


It's not really a "green" color as mentioned in the Cricket article... (picky, I know, but just FYI)

Wales is a full member? I doubt it. RGDS Alexmcfire

Wales comes under the English board - so the "England" team actually represents England and Wales. (see England cricket team.) AJHW

Recolour please?

The West Indies are virtually impossible to see, even when made full-screen, and a change in the colour palette may address this. I would suggest a bold red for the full members. --Dweller (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Japan

Japan is an associate member according to the team's article. Bnynms (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Is that Gibraltar?

What is the green patch in southern Spain? Is it meant to represent Gibraltar? Maproom (talk) 08:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)