In this article, we are going to explore the topic of
File talk:Greatest common divisor chart.png in detail. Throughout history,
File talk:Greatest common divisor chart.png has played a crucial role in numerous contexts and situations. From its origins to its relevance today,
File talk:Greatest common divisor chart.png has been the subject of study and debate by experts in the field. Through this article, we will immerse ourselves in the fascinating world of
File talk:Greatest common divisor chart.png, exploring its different facets and discovering its impact on various aspects of society. We will delve into its historical importance, its contemporary implications and future perspectives related to
File talk:Greatest common divisor chart.png.
I understand that the graph is supposed to look pretty and I'm learned enough to know that gcd is applicable only to integers but the use of lines currently implies that gcd(1,1.5)=1 which is nonsense. It also shows that gcd(0,0)=0. As such graph wrong at infinitely many places and correct at only a few. I could probably tolerate points connected by much thinner lines but not the graph as it now stands so I propose to remove it from the gcd article unless and until it reaches a higher standard.
The colours are particularly unsuitable for those with achromatopsia or dichromacy which makes roughly 1/3 of all those who are colour blind to some degree or another. This should also be addressed.Waerloeg (talk) 00:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)