File talk:Daily Iowan.jpg
In this article we will do a detailed analysis of File talk:Daily Iowan.jpg, exploring its most relevant aspects and its impact on current society. From its origins to its evolution over time, File talk:Daily Iowan.jpg has played a fundamental role in various contexts, generating debates and controversies around its meaning and implications. Throughout these pages, we will examine its influence in different fields, as well as its relevance in people's daily lives. There is no doubt that File talk:Daily Iowan.jpg has marked a before and after in history, leaving an indelible mark on culture, politics, the economy and in many other areas. Join us on this journey to discover everything File talk:Daily Iowan.jpg has to offer and how it has shaped our world to this day.
 | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
FUR tag
@Stefan2: Every element in {{Non-free use rationale}} is already explicitly and particularly addressed on the page. Formatting that information through a template is not necessary. If you believe there is some particular element missing, please let me know and I'll add it. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- The "summary" section contains a source (WP:NFCC#10a). The "fair use rationale" section states that the copyright tag is valid and reveals that the article in which the image is used. The licensing section contains a copyright tag, but a copyright tag is not in itself a fair use rationale, so any text in the copyright tag can be disregarded. WP:FUR states that the file must contain a rationale
explaining how the image is used in a way consistent with Wikipedia's non-free content criteria
, but the file information page only states that the file is used in a way consistent with the non-free content criteria, not how it is used in such a way. Replacing the word 'how' with 'that' is a common error in non-templated rationales, and rationales where 'how' is replaced with 'that' are not compliant with WP:NFCC#10c. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)- Good grief - the use of a low-resolution image of the front page of a newspaper to illustrate the newspaper in the newspaper's own article is classic Wikipedia fair use. If you didn't like the rationale, you could literally copy-and-paste one from any other newspaper-cover image out there. But the current one meets NFCC#10c, which you identify as being the problem. Its used in one article. That article is identified. The purpose it is used for is identified: "is being used to illustrate the publication in question". – Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)