In today's world,
File talk:Chuck Close 1.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and interest to an increasingly broad audience. The importance of
File talk:Chuck Close 1.jpg lies in its impact on various aspects of society, from the economy to culture, politics and the environment.
File talk:Chuck Close 1.jpg has generated debate and controversy, and has even been the subject of research and studies that seek to understand it in its entirety. In this article, we will explore different facets of
File talk:Chuck Close 1.jpg, analyzing its meaning, its evolution over time, and its influence on the world today. In addition, we will examine possible solutions and alternatives to the challenges that
File talk:Chuck Close 1.jpg presents, with the aim of offering a comprehensive and updated vision on this topic of global relevance.
- Note to the reviewing admin: I tagged this as replaceable fair use because the file was being used as the primary means of identification of the artist in the main infobox. The file, however, appears to have been inadvertantly moved there and has since been replaced by a freely licensed equivalent image of the artist himself. The NFCC#8 issues I raised related to the file's non-free use are also being addressed by the addition of more sourced critical commentary about it to the file's caption, and (possibly) later on to the relevant section of the article itself. I am only leaving the rfu template up because it has been disputted and am not sure if it would be proper to remove one template without removing the other as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'm fine with both templates being removed; it's proper if you want to withdraw it, and I obviously consent to you withdrawing your RFU objection. postdlf (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)