File talk:Average annual precipitation in China(English).png
In today's world, File talk:Average annual precipitation in China(English).png has gained great relevance in various areas of society. Its impact has been felt in politics, culture, technology and people's daily lives. File talk:Average annual precipitation in China(English).png has generated debates, controversies and significant changes that have marked a before and after in recent history. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the importance of File talk:Average annual precipitation in China(English).png, its implications and its influence on different aspects of modern life. From its origins to its consequences, we will analyze in detail the role that File talk:Average annual precipitation in China(English).png plays in the current world and its projection into the future.
.png&sq=File_talk:Average_annual_precipitation_in_China(English).png&lang=en&file=File:Symbol_file_class.svg){kind=small} | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.png&sq=File_talk:Average_annual_precipitation_in_China(English).png&lang=en&file=File:TempleofHeaven-HallofPrayer.jpg){kind=small}
Boundaries shown reflects only the point of view of the People's Republic of China (e.g. its claim to Arunachal Pradesh in northeastern India, which it doesn't control). (Please respond at image talk:ChinaGeography.png.) — Instantnood 18:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Not to seem insensitive, but this is a rainfall map. Wether Arunachal Pradesh is controled by India or China, the rainfall information is still relevant, right?
The correct Russian would be Википедия - свободная энциклопедия. Right now it's in the genitive case, comparable to the English "Wikipedia's, the free encyclopedia's". PeepP 00:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
- Why do we need a wikipedia logo on the image in the first place though? I think it would be better without it, I dislike how companies tend to spam their logo all over their images making them inconvenient to reuse, so I would rather see it not done with the WP logo. Richard001 10:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- The wikipedia logo is actually copyright of wikimedia and so it should be removed from this image since it is not cc-by-2.5 compatible. -Ravedave (help name my baby) 22:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)